000			01488cab a2200325 4500
001			X3312
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u29717
041			_aeng
245			_aAEG (UK) ltd v Translift Monorail Ltd
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[1996] CILL 1138(1)
520			_aORB 22 February 1996. A dispute centering around amplifiers fitted with a protection device (potentiometer) for use in a thrill ride. The plaintiff`s parent supplier set the device at a level which, on testing, activated the warning lights on the steepest section of the ride. The plaintiffs argued that had the potentiometers been set at a different level the equipment would have passed the tests and was not therefore unfit for use. It was concluded that although the product cuould provide the performance required, it would be against the manufacturer`s stated recommendations and thus the product was not fit for the purpose for which it was sold.
650			_aAMPLIFIERS
650			_aCONTRACTUAL CLAIMS
650			_aEFTELING PARK
650			_aFITNESS FOR PURPOSE
650			_aHOLLAND
650			_aMANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS
650			_aROLLERCOASTER RIDES
650			_aSALE OF GOODS
650			_aSUPPLY OF GOODS
650			_aTHEME PARKS
650			_aTOLERANCES
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING PATHOLOGY
690			_aLAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c19985 _d19985