| 000 | 01171cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3314 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u29725 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 15 EG 103-110(8) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 22 February 1996. See ABS54763 (WLR) and ABS51781 (for CA decision). Upheld the decision of the CA that second defendant and their guarantor were liable to pay rent arrears incurred when the company to whom the premises were assigned in 1989 went into liquidation in 1992. The lease had been assigned to the second defendant in 1987, they argued that they had determined the lease in 1989. | ||
| 650 | _aDETERMINATION OF LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aDISCLAIMER OF LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aHINDCASTLE LTD V BARBARA ATTENBOROUGH ASSOCIATES AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aINSOLVENCY ACT 1986 | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aLIQUIDATION | ||
| 650 | _aORIGINAL TENANT LIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aPRIVITY OF CONTRACT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c19991 _d19991 |
||