| 000 | 00991cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41410 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u29975 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCEMP Properties v Dentsply Research and Development Corp...(No. 1) | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 35 EG 99-107(5) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 20 November 1987. The first of three judgments relating to a series of transactions and should be read together. A claim was established under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 s2(1) against the defendant vendor (D), with regard to statements about rights to light and air. No claim for negligence thought appropriate, though judgment for the plaintiffs on the issue of liability. Judgments on quantifying damages and third party claims against D`s solicitors reported separately. | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT TO AIR | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT TO LIGHT | ||
| 690 | _aLAND-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c20173 _d20173 |
||