| 000 | 01156cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53291 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u3304 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 245 | _aAgricultural occupancy issues | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9529) 22 July 1995, 116-117(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Handoll v Warner Goodman & Streat" (1995) (See AbsZ8221), in which the CA held an agricultural occupancy condition did not apply as the bungalow had been built a distance away from the location approved for planning permission 4 years before the case came to court so that in effect the bungalow had been built without planning permission, | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aF G WHITLEY AND SONS CO LTD V SOS WALES | ||
| 650 | _aHANDOLL | ||
| 650 | _aKERRIER DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aWARNER GOODMAN AND STREAT | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 690 | _aRURAL PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aMartin, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c2018 _d2018 |
||