000			01413cab a2200337 4500
001			ABS51489
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u30019
041			_aeng
100			_aPowell-Smith, V.
245		2	_aA case of control over contract completion
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aContract Journal _v375(5997) 20 October 1994, 14(1)
520			_aExamines the caselaw affecting unsatisfactory rates of building progress under the PSA contract and GC/Works/1, contracts which, unlike most standard forms, incorporate provision for regular assessment of progress. The terms `regularly and diligently` have been subject to judicial scrutiny in several cases, of which the most significant are reported here.
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650			_aCOMPLETION
650			_aCONSTRUCTION PROGRAMMES
650			_aCONTRACT PROGRAMMES
650			_aDUE DILIGENCE
650			_aEXTENSIONS OF TIME
650			_aGREATER LONDON COUNCIL V CLEVELAND BRIDGE AND ENGINEERING CO LTD
650			_aHOOKER CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD V CHRISS ENGINEERING
650			_aHOUNSLOW LBC V TWICKENHAM GARDEN DEVELOPMENTS
650			_aPROGRESS
650			_aREGULARLY AND DILIGENTLY
650			_aWEST FAULKNER AND ASSOCIATE V NEWHAM LBC
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c20207 _d20207