000			01236cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS41421
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u30043
041			_aeng
245			_aMikeover Ltd v Brady
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v139(6422) 8 September 1989, 1194-1196(3)
520			_aCA 26 May 1989. At issue was whether two tenants of a residential property held a joint tenancy or licence . Two individuals signed identical agreements which allowed them the right of exclusive joint occupation of the flat - each liable for paying a separate deposit and to pay a separate sum in rent. Eventually one of them moved out and B remained in occupation. When B fell into arrears, a possession order was brought against him on the basis that he was only a licensee. B claimed he was a statutory tenant under the Rent Act, and appealed. Held: the tenant was not entitled to a statutory tenancy. For a joint tenancy to exist, there had to be a unity of interest which included a joint and several obligation to pay the entire rent.
650			_aEXCLUSIVE OCCUPATION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c20224 _d20224