000			01579cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS41424
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u30061
041			_aeng
245			_aTrustees of the Gift of Thomas Pocklington v Hill and Another
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 36 EG 87-90(3)
520			_aCA 16 March 1989. Appeal by landlords (T) from cc decision dismissing a claim for possession of a house occupied successively by H and S, daughters of the original tenant (B). The house was let to B in the 1930s on a weekly tenancy. He lived there until he died in 1982. Shortly before his death, H who had married, moved back to nurse B. On his death, H took out letters of administration and continued to live in the house for several months, paying the rent. About two weeks before H left, her sister S moved in and has lived there since 1983. At issue was whether T were entitled to possession. Cc judge rejected their claim, on the grounds that B`s contractual tenancy had never been determined. It followed that H became a contractual tenant and there was no doubt that S occupied the house with her sister`s consent; she was therefore a protected tenant. CA agreed but the interpretation was different. CA considered the effects of Rent Act 1977 s49(4) . In the almost complete absence of ev
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c20237 _d20237