000			01103cab a2200253 4500
001			WB3015-34
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u30375
041			_aeng
245			_aStatutory lease renewals
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9415) 16 April 1994, 154(1)
520			_aDiscusses "M&P Enterprises (London) Ltd v Norfolk Square Hotels Ltd" which considered whether a section 25 notice was invalid because it failed to name the landlord with complete accuracy and whether the notices served by the landlord, although held to be invalid as a section 25 notice, could nevertheless function as a counternotice to the tenant`s section 26 request. (See also WB3013-45).
650			_aGANTON HOUSE INVESTMENTS LTD V CROSSMAN INVESTMENTS LTD
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S25
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S26
650			_aLENGTH OF TERM
650			_aSECTION 25 NOTICES
650			_aSECTION 26 NOTICES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c20470 _d20470