| 000 | 00840cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2518-16 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u30414 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1989 63 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Lynnthorpe Enterprises Ltd v Sidney Smith (Chelsea) Ltd , ChD 28 April 1989, there is a presumption in favour of reality and this clearly requires the terms of the hypothetical lease to reflect variations made to the terms of the actual lease. The lessors` contention that the terms of the 1986 deed, as to use for a restaurant only, were personal to the plaintiffs, and did not bind successors in title was not accepted. | ||
| 650 | _aUSER COVENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c20498 _d20498 |
||