| 000 | 00953cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3492 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u30826 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBoard of Trustees of the National Provident Fund v Brierley Investments Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v[1996] NPC 102 (2) |
||
| 520 | _aPrivy Council 24 June 1996. A contractual obligation in an agreement for a lease not to offer for completion a lease containing a `ratchet clause` does not preclude the execution of a lease containing a provision which has in substance the same effect. (HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL) - NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED. | ||
| 650 | _aBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL PROVIDENT FUND V BRIERLEY INVESTMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aNEW ZEALAND | ||
| 650 | _aRATCHET CLAUSE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c20770 _d20770 |
||