| 000 | 01591cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41587 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u31052 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBeresforde and Another v Chesterfield BC and Another | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 39 EG 176-178(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 10 July 1989. Appeal by purchaser (B) from decision by Official Referee, who struck out a claim against the Woolwich Equitable Building Society , (W), on the grounds that it showed no reasonable cause of action. B commenced an action for negligence against W and the local council (C), after serious defects were discovered in a house purchased by B. The valuation report from an independent firm of surveyors, instructed by W, was headed with W`s name and though it mentioned the fact that the house was constructed on a site affected by coal mine workings, it assumed that the house had been built on a concrete raft foundation. The Official Referee struck out B`s claim, stating that W could not be liable for the negligence of its independent contractor - the firm of surveyors. B appealed to CA, submitting that the heading of the report with W`s name and the reference to W`s valuer conveyed the impression that the report was W`s report and as such it negligently misrepresented the value | ||
| 650 | _aHARRIS V WYRE FOREST DC | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE VALUATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSMITH V ERIC S BUSH | ||
| 650 | _aSUBSIDENCE | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c20874 _d20874 |
||