| 000 | 00876cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3549 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u31106 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBoyle v Verrall | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v[1996] NPC 123, (2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 26 July 1996. A landlord who has not satisfied the first condition for terminating an assured tenancy of a flat under Ground 1 of Schedule 2 of the Housing Act 1988, is nonetheless able to persuade the CA that it would be just and equitable for her to recover possession. TAKEN FROM JOURNAL. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED. | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aBOYLE V VERRALL | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aPOSSESSION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c20900 _d20900 |
||