| 000 | 01293cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2422-09 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u31518 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNegligence action against local authority and builder fails | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v2/6/88 p43 |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Audsley and another v Leeds City Council and another" , QBD 6 May 1988, the house-owners` claim for damages for loss and inconvenience was dismissed. They alleged negligence and/or breach of statutory duty by the council and a builder who had been engaged by the previous house-owner to erect an extension. Though the extension had building defects , failure by the previous house-owner to assign the right to sue for negligence was fatal to an otherwise good claim. | ||
| 650 | _aANNS AND OTHERS V MERTON LBC | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aAUDSLEY AND ANOTHER V LEEDS CITY COUNCIL AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING ELEMENTS-COMPLETE BUILDING ELEMENTS-FOUNDATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aPIRELLI GENERAL CABLE WORKS LTD V OSCAR FABER AND PARTNERS | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC HEALTH ACT 1936 | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c21162 _d21162 |
||