000			01582cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS41678
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u31643
041			_aeng
245			_aBatchelor v Kent CC
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v1989 RVR 181-184(4)
520			_aCA 26 July 1989. The council purchased two adjoining parcels of freehold land . One parcel the order land, was included in a compulsory purchase order and the claimant served a notice requiring the council to buy the adjoining strip. Maidstone BC granted outline planning permission for development of an area to the east and south of this land for residential use subject to certain conditions including that no one should occupy dwellings in phase 2 of the three stage development until the off site road works in respect of the phase were complete. The council entered into an agreement with the developer to improve roads in the area including the building of a roundabout which was to be on the order land. LT awarded £500,000 for the order land and £150,000 for the adjoining. The council appealed contending that the award did not observe the Pointe Gourde principle ie that an increase in value entirely due to the scheme underlying the acquisition was to be ignored and Land Compensation A
650			_aACCESS
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21240 _d21240