000			01434cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS41679
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u31650
041			_aeng
245			_aHertfordshire County Council v Ozanne and Others
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 43 EG 182-184(2)
520			_aCA 28 July 1989 Appeal by Hertfordshire CC (H) from LT decision awarding compensation of £1.24m to Ozanne and others (O), in respect of the compulsory purchase of a strip of land for highway improvements . LT had rejected the agricultural value of £5,500 contended by H, on the basis that the land was a ransom strip i.e. it was required for the purpose of improving a lane as a prerequisite to the proposed development of a large area north of the lane. H appealed, claiming that LT had not observed the Pointe Gourde principle or properly applied Land Compensation Act S5 Rule 3 . CA held that LT was wrong to say that in a no-acquisition world the land had value as a ransom strip unless the development scheme was identified. For this reason the appeal was allowed and the case would have to be remitted to the tribunal. However, CA did agree with LT that Rule 3 did not apply.
650			_aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21244 _d21244