| 000 | 01153cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | A20 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u31687 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHitchins (Hatfield) Ltd v The Prudential Assurance Co Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _v35(6) 9 May 1991, 58(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 27 March 1991. A case regarding the interpretation of wording of a contractor`s combined insurance policies covering, among other things, loss to the contractor arising out of a `defect in design` subject to a proviso excluding costs of redesign. The court held that the words `defectively designed` connote activity on behalf of the designer, so the insurer cannot raise a defence of defective design to a claim of redesigning costs without proving negligence or fault on behalf of the contractor. | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS POLICIES | ||
| 650 | _aDESIGN DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 690 |
_aINSURANCE _96249 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c21270 _d21270 |
||