| 000 | 01059cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3648 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u31819 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aKeen v SoS Environment and Aylesbury Vale DC | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1996 JPL 753-760(8) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 12 May 1995. Agricultural workers dwelling. Stockman. Calving. PPG7, Functional and financial tests satisfied. Need established. Part-timeme farmer. Substantial family house. Separate planning unit to farm. Decision of planning Inspector alleged to be unreasonable and perverse. Suggested (inter alia) stockman could share existing dwelling. Consideration of authorities on unreasonableness. Decision of Inspector quashed. (Headnote abstract) | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL WORKERS | ||
| 650 | _aDWELLING | ||
| 650 | _aPPG7 | ||
| 650 | _aSEPARATE UNIT | ||
| 650 | _aUNREASONABLENESS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c21359 _d21359 |
||