| 000 | 01003cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41701 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u31851 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWilkinson, H. W. | ||
| 245 | _aCovenant to keep a shop open | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v139(6341) 10 November 1989, 1529-1541(3) |
||
| 520 | _aThis article considers, with reference to two particular cases F W Woolworth PLC v Charlwood Alliance Properties Ltd (See Abstract 37703) and Braddon Towers v International Stores Ltd (1987) 1 EGLR 207, that if a tenant under a covenant to trade at the demised premises ceases to do so, but asks for the landlord `s consent to an assignment to someone who also has not the intention or the ability to trade, can the landlord`s consent be reasonably withheld. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c21379 _d21379 |
||