000			01331cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS41704
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u31879
041			_aeng
100			_aMartin, J.
245			_aLiving over the shop; no protection for subtenants
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v139(6424) 22 September 1989, 1260-1276(4)
520			_aExamines two cases Pittalis v Grant (1989) (See Abstract 41122) and Maunsell v Olins (See Abstract 18466) which considered the rights of subtenants under Rent Act 1977 s137 (3) . In Pittalis it was held that a flat above a shop was not to be treated as a dwelling-house and in the Maunsell case a subtenant of a cottage forming part of an agricultural holding was not protected against the head landlord by the predecessor of s137 (3). Concludes with the view that the difficulties caused by s173 (3) should be eased by Housing Act 1988 .
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aHEADLEASE
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
650			_aSUBTENANCIES
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21393 _d21393