000			01133cab a2200181 4500
001			WB2512-40
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u31938
041			_aeng
245			_aRent Act 1977
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1989 42
520			_aTrustees of the gift of Thomas Pocklington v Hill and another , CA 16 March 1989. In the almost complete absence of evidence of rent increases it could not be inferred that a contractual tenancy was ever determined. The first respondent therefore acquired the contractual term on her father`s death. The first respondent`s tenancy became a statutory tenancy in September 1985 on the issue of a second notice of rent increase. However, when the second respondent went into possession in January 1983, she acquired the first respondent`s tenancy by assignment . Accordingly, she held the contractual term for some time before it was converted into a statutory tenancy; she is entitled to remain in possession and is protected by the Rent Act 1977 .
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21431 _d21431