000			01226cab a2200205 4500
001			WB2512-42
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u32037
041			_aeng
245			_aRent review
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1989 43
520			_aIn Trusthouse Forte Albany Hotels Ltd v Daejan Investments Ltd No 2, CA 17 March 1989, it was held that the review clause presupposes a hypothetical letting of the whole of the areas edged in red on the plans. Two extra red lines, which at one point, arbitrarily divided an area used as a bank into two areas must be attributed to a clerical error for they did not appear on the counterpart underlease. The appeal was allowed on this issue and it must be assumed that all the areas edged in red are being let under a single lease. However the appellants contention that the areas edged in red were to be valued on the basis that they are available for letting both for shopping and retail purposes, and for any other purpose permitted by the lease and public law, was not accepted.
650			_aRENT REVIEW
650			_aValuation _96273
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21499 _d21499