000			01328cab a2200229 4500
001			X3676
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u32055
041			_aeng
245			_aR v SoS Environment, ex parte RSPB
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1996] JPL 844-850(7)
520			_aCourt of Justice Of the European Communities 11 July 1996. EC Directive 79/ 409 Conservation of Wild Birds - EC Directive 92/43 Conservation of the natural habitats of wild fauna - Lappel bank - Special Protection Areas - Discretion of member states - Economic and social considerations - ECJ held that Article 4(1) or (2) of Directive 79/409 is to be interpreted as meaning that a member state is not authorised to take account of the economic requirements mentioned in Articel 2 when designation an SPA - economic requirements do not constitute general interest superior to that represented by the ecological objective of the directive nor an overriding public interest as referred to in Article 6(4) of 92/43 (HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL)
650			_aNATURAL HABITATS
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P RSPB
650			_aSPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS
650			_aWILD BIRDS
690			_aCONSERVATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21513 _d21513