| 000 | 01133cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3679 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u32081 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Basildon DC ex parte Clarke | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1996] JPL 866-870(5) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 21 December 1995. Enforcement notice - non compliance - injunctive proceedings - judicial review - injunction granted compliance suspended pending leave for review - excessive delay - whether County Court could deal with complaint of substance about the terms of of the local authority resolution - HELD County Court Judge in the exercise of his discretion could properly take into account procedural errors which differed from the issue of planning merits. The Court`s powers in respect of injunctive relief are inherently discretionary. (HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL) | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICE | ||
| 650 | _aEXCESSIVE DELAY | ||
| 650 | _aR V BASILDON DC EX P CLARKE | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c21530 _d21530 |
||