000			01688cab a2200313 4500
001			ABS51548
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u32907
041			_aeng
245			_aWards Construction (Medway) v Barclays Bank plc
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 40 EG 135-138(4)
520			_aCA 1 July 1994. To facilitate conditions for compliance with planning permission, W agreed with Kent CC to pay 65% of land acquisition costs. Kent compulsorily purchased land from HB (later Barclays) and LT determined compensation at £500,000 with a further £150,000 for adjoining land. On appeal to the CA the case (as "Batchelor v Kent" Abs41678) was remitted to the LT where compensation was set at £2.15m and £10,000. The claimant appealed for a figure of £3.583m and W, liable for 65% of the cost, stated a case to the CA. W argued that the relative merits of the "Pointe Gourde" principle and "Stokes v Cambridge" were misapplied. Both appeals were dismissed and the LT`s award remained.
650			_aACCESS
650			_aBATCHELOR V KENT CC
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 S53
650			_aNO-SCHEME WORLD
650			_aPOINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
650			_aSTOKES PRINCIPLE
650			_aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE CORPORATION
650			_aValuation _96273
650			_aWARDS CONSTRUCTION (MEDWAY) V BARCLAYS BANK PLC
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c21986 _d21986