000			01255cab a2200325 4500
001			WB2839-60
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u32999
041			_aeng
245			_aDTC cleared of negligence
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Times _v(1161) 2 October 1992, 1(1)
520			_aIn "Macey v Debenham Tewson and Chinnocks" 1992, after considering fresh evidence (see also WB2830-56 and WB2837-74) the High Court dismissed a claim of negligence against the defendant chartered surveyors DTC on the grounds that market evidence was more important in considering the basis of a valuation than indices and statistics which show trends. Important test case for firms facing similar negligence claims.
650			_aABOUT RICS-RICS MEMBERS
650			_aEQUIVALENT YIELD
650			_aHOPE VALUE
650			_aMACEY V DEBENHAM TEWSON & CHINNOCKS
650			_aMAIDENHEAD
650			_aMARKET EVIDENCE
650			_aMARRIAGE VALUE
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aOVER-VALUATION
650			_aRETAIL PROPERTY
650			_aValuation _96273
650			_aVALUERS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c22053 _d22053