| 000 | 00978cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3817 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u33101 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBarclays Bank plc v Thomson | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v[1996] NPC 155(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 7 November 1996. In the context of an allegation of constructive notice of undue influence: there is no reason why a bank which instructs solicitors to give independent advice to a signatory to a mortgage, who might otherwise go unadvised, should thereby be disabled from relying on the solicitor`s certificate that such advice had been properly given. (Taken from case heading). NOTE:- NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED. | ||
| 650 | _aBARCLAYS BANK PLC V THOMSON | ||
| 650 | _aINDEPENDENT ADVICE | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGES | ||
| 650 | _aUNDUE INFLUENCE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c22125 _d22125 |
||