000			01085cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS41869
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u33121
041			_aeng
245			_aStradbroke (Earl of) v Mitchell
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 49 EG 59-64(5)
520			_aChD 14 July 1989. The landlord (S) served notice on the tenant of two farms (M) to quit and deliver up possession as from 11 October 1989. S contended that no counternotice requiring arbitration had been served; M contended that the notice to quit was not a valid notice. S sought a declaration that the tenancy would duly determine; M sought a declaration that a valid notice requiring arbitration had been given and an injunction restraining S from enforcing the notice to quit. The matter was concluded in favour of M, that the notice to quit was fraudulent; there was evidence that S knew that M was not in breach of the tenancy.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c22141 _d22141