| 000 | 01258cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3835 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u33257 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA and T Investments v SoS Environment and another | |
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR 540(19) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 19 January 1996. Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289 - Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s65 - residential or hotel use - whether decision irrational - whether inspector obliged to consider imposition of condition as alternative to enforcement notice - whether successful appeal against enforcment notice gives rise to issue estoppel in relation to listed building enforcement notice - correct approach where issue estoppel alleged in enforcment proceedings [Taken from article headnote]. | ||
| 650 | _aA AND T INVESTMENTS V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aISSUE ESTOPPEL | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS ACT 1990 S65 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S289 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c22229 _d22229 |
||