000			00910cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS41889
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u33287
041			_aeng
245			_aTyack v SoS for the Environment
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1989) 1 WLR 1392-1398(7)
520			_aHL 7 December 1989. The appellant`s barn within the curtilage of his house was under an enforcement notice for demolition as it was not on agricultural land within article 3 Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1977 Class VI . The appeal that the adjoining plot separated from the house and curtilage by a farm track owned by a third party, was still an agricultural unit, thereby complying with the minimum area required for development, was dismissed.
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c22249 _d22249