| 000 | 00723cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2512-70 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u33288 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aExecution and delivery of deed | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1989 39 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Longman v Viscount Chelsea and others , CA 10 March 1989, it was held that execution of a deed does not import the delivery of a deed. Knowledge that the deed of variation with the neighbour had to be completed first did not make the deed granting the lease to the appellant as escrow which had been delivered. | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c22250 _d22250 |
||