000			01049cab a2200193 4500
001			WB2512-71
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u33383
041			_aeng
245			_aOption to purchase
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1989 40
520			_aIn Briargate Developments Ltd v Newprop Co Ltd , ChD 6 March 1989, it was held that the plaintiffs had transferred to Taylor Woodrow the fruits of the benefit of the option agreement, not the benefit of the agreement. Accordingly the agreement with TW was not a breach of clause 3, and not an attempt to avoid the profit-sharing requirement of clause 17. However, the defendants were not obliged to transfer their interest directly to TW as this could not be required under the terms of the agreement between the parties. The plaintiff`s claim for specific performance of the agreement to complete therefore succeeded.
650			_aSHOPPING CENTRES
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c22307 _d22307