| 000 | 01024cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53344 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u3658 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBroadgate Square plc v Lehman Brothers Ltd (NO 2) | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 33 EG 89-91(3) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 4 April 1995. Application by tenant (L) for an extension of time under s22 of the Arbitration Act 1950 to remit award on grounds of technical misconduct due to the fact that L`s valuer`s submission for a 10% discoununt for the onerous nature of the clause had been addressed in evidence to the arbitrator. Held that there had been no technical misconduct by thee arbitrator. Application dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aARBITAL AWARD | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATON ACT 1950 S22 | ||
| 650 | _aDISCOUNT | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 690 | _aARBITRATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c2246 _d2246 |
||