| 000 | 01210cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X3921 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u33764 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v SoS Environment and Compton ex p. West Wiltshire DC | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1997] JPL 210-217(8) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 6 March 1996. Animal by-product rendering process - offensive smells - Environmental Protection Act 1990 - section 6(4) - text for grant of authorisation - application for judicial review - test case - full BATNEEC standard not being achieved by the company - Inspector not convinced company could meet the BPM standards and concluded company not likely to be able to carry out process in compliance with Act - SoS disagreed - authorisation granted - inadequate basis and reasons for this decision - decision quashed. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL. | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 | ||
| 650 | _aJUDICIAL REVIEW | ||
| 650 | _aOFFENSIVE SMELLS | ||
| 650 | _aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND ANOTHER EX P WEST WILTSHIRE DC | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c22492 _d22492 |
||