| 000 | 01108cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS42008 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u34025 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAssociated British Ports v C H Bailey plc | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 49 EG 53-59(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 27 July 1989. Appeal by tenants, C H Bailey plc (B), against dismissal of their appeal from the masters order giving the landlords, Associated British Ports (ABP), leave under the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 to take proceedings against B. The proceedings concerned the commercial dry dock at Barry in South Wales demised to B. The appeal related to the application of earlier Court of Appeal decisions. Lord Denning and Lord Harman had said the landlord must show a " prima facie " case, while Diplock had said that he must show an arguable case. The present CA contended that there was no material difference between the two expressions. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c22595 _d22595 |
||