000			01596cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS37317
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u3686
041			_aeng
245			_aYoung and Others v Dalgety Plc
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v281 (6319) 31 January 1987, 427-430 (3)
520			_aAn appeal by the landlords, from a decision which held that certain items light fittings and floor coverings , were tenants` fixtures which should not be taken into account for the determination of rent under a review clause. The lease was for a term of 30 years at £240,000 pa, subject to review. The fittings had been installed in pursuance of obligations binding the tenants to do so in an agreement entered into prior to execution of the lease. The effect of this was a main issue in the case, and there was much consideration of the decision in Mowats Ltd v Hudson Bros Ltd cited by the tenants; it was contended that the fact that the floor coverings and light fittings had been installed in pursuance of the tenants` contractual obligations, did not prevent them from being removeable tenants` fixtures. On appeal, it was held that the judge had reached the right conclusion, and that the landlords obtained no title to the floor coverings and light fittings. They were tenants` fixtures and
650			_aFIXTURES AND FITTINGS
650			_aRENT DETERMINATION
650			_aRENT REVIEW CLAUSE
650			_aTENANTS FIXTURES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c2260 _d2260