000			01352cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS51582
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u34053
041			_aeng
245			_aWaitt and another v Morris and another
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 39 EG 140-142(3)
520			_aLT 3 August 1994. W were leaseholders of a flat and applied for a 90-year lease extension at a peppercorn rent. Applying for a determination of the price payable, W`s valuer suggested a marriage value of £2000, being the difference between the current open market value and value of the extended lease, and that M should take 50% share. W also sought a covenant requiring M to give notice of any forfeiture proceedings. As a prospective purchaser had offered a higher sum for the lease than the extended value, the marriage value and landlord`s share were raised by the LT and unpaid arrears of rent awarded. The requested covenant was deemed unnecessary.
650			_aDETERMINATION OF PRICE
650			_aLEASE EXTENSION
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
650			_aMARRIAGE VALUE
650			_aOPEN MARKET VALUE
650			_aPEPPERCORN RENT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c22608 _d22608