000			01143cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS42013
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u34069
041			_aeng
245			_aDurham City Estates Ltd v Felicetti and another
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 03 EG 71
520			_aCA 14 February 1989. Dispute over the validity of a trigger notice issued by the landlords, (DC), to the tenants (F). The notice contained a discrepancy between the amount of rent stated in figures and that stated in words. F considered this made the notice bad and therefore invalid. DC issued a writ claiming rent arrears. The High Court decided that the discrepancy was a typographical error and was not misleading and decided in favour of DC. F appealed. The CA decided that the correct test had been applied in the original trial; did the notice specify the amount of rent with sufficient clarity to prevent its recipients from being misled. The CA agreed that it was, appeal dismissed.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c22616 _d22616