| 000 | 01024cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51605 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u34918 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aHarrison, A. | ||
| 245 | _aCertainty in certification | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v138(41) 28 October 1994, 1102-1103(2) |
||
| 520 | _aMakes the point, highlighted in the recent planning case "R v Sheffield CC ex parte Power" (1994), that determinations of `established use` or `lawful development` by a local authority are of a quasi-judicial character and generally require a legal opinion. | ||
| 650 | _aCERTIFICATES OF LAWFULNESS OF EXISTING USE OR DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCIRCULAR 17/92 | ||
| 650 | _aEXISTING USE | ||
| 650 | _aTEN YEAR RULE | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S191 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988 26A | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c22996 _d22996 |
||