000			01287cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS51625
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u35821
041			_aeng
245			_aJordan v Norfolk CC
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1994) 4 AllER 218-224(4)
520			_aChD 11 May 1994. N caused a sewage pipe to be laid through J`s land, without permission, and cut down numerous trees in the process. N was held to have trespased, and was ordered to remove the pipe and replace the trees. J was granted £25,000 damages. To replant the area, J`s consultant estimated costs of up to £300,000, in contrast to N`s estimate of £25,000. N sought a determination that J`s estimate was not `reasonably practicable` as required by the court`s mandatory order. "Held", in N`s favour, that the judge could not have intended costs so large in relation to the land`s value and ordered appointment of a new landscape architect.
650			_aJONES V SHERWOOD COMPUTER SERVICES PLC 1992
650			_aJORDAN V NORFOLK CC
650			_aREPLACEMENT COSTS
650			_aSEWER PIPE
650			_aTREES
650			_aTRESPASS
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c23423 _d23423