| 000 | 01177cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51632 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u36212 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aJE Clark & Co v Rogers (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v(1994) 7/8 RA 169-209(21) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 10 June 1994. Following alteration of premises and subletting to new occupiers between 1988 and 1992, rateable values were revised and the rating list amended. The ratepayer appealed against the valuation, stressing the poor standard of the buildings and arguing that the open market value of the whole complex in 1988 was the most reliable guide to assessment. Rental values were not used in this case and valuation was based on the `tone of the list`. "Held" that the 1988 open market value be used as evidence and the assessment be reduced. | ||
| 650 | _aASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aJE CLARK & CO V ROGERS (VO) 1994 | ||
| 650 | _aOPEN MARKET RENTAL VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aREDUCTION | ||
| 650 | _aWAREHOUSES | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c23596 _d23596 |
||