000			01197cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS42377
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u36442
041			_aeng
245			_aSun Alliance and London Assurance Co Ltd v British Railways Board
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v(1989) 2 EGLR 237-239(2)
520			_aChD 28 October 1986. SA were underlessors and the defendants (BR) underlessees of Templegate House, Bristol. SA wished BR to contribute towards the cost and maintenance of an automated window cleaning lift to replace an older structure operated by a maintenance contractor. BR claimed that the clauses that bound them to pay for the maintenance of equipment and cleaning did not apply to the new lift since it was added after the tenancy agreement had been signed. The judge considered that the clause concerning services and equipment for the benefit of the building and its proper maintenance included new equipment. SA were entitled to their money claim against BR.
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c23664 _d23664