000			01491cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS42385
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u36490
041			_aeng
245			_aWalker v Strathclyde RC
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aScots Law Times _v1990 SLT 17-20(4)
520			_aLT for Scotland 22 March 1989. A head teacher applied to the council, of which she was a tenant to purchase the house which she occupied. This was refused. She appealed to LT. The council submitted that as their title to the house reserved a right of reversion to the superior in the event of the house ceasing to be used for educational purposes, they were unable to grant a good and marketable title to the house as required by Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 they also claimed that the tenancy was not a secure one as the house was within the curtilage of a building mainly held by the landlord for purposes other than the provision of housing accommodation and rights of access would have to be granted over the playground. It was held that the title provision was irrelevant and the existence of a restrictive covenant did not necessarily prevent the tribunal finding that a tenant had a right to purchase; that the tribunal had no powers to vary or discharge land obligations in the landlords tit
650			_aRIGHT TO BUY
650			_aSCOTLAND
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c23676 _d23676