| 000 | 01174cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | E2054 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u37295 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBudge v Budge and others | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSLC _v1993 R 136-144(9) |
||
| 520 | _aSLC Application Skye RN 500 Order of 14 April 1993. Certain members of the family of a deceased tenant applied to the Court for and Order declaring that the right of the deceased tenant to the tenancy of his crofts had not been disposed of according to law by his executor. The brother of the deceased tenant had been appointed executor dative and after confirmation had been granted in his favour he nominated his son to succeed to the tenancy. The Court held in granting the crave of the application that the son of the executor dative was not one of those persons entitled to succeed to the tenancy on intestacy. | ||
| 650 | _aCROFTING | ||
| 650 | _aSCOTLAND | ||
| 650 | _aSCOTTISH LAND COURT | ||
| 650 | _aSLC | ||
| 650 | _aSUCCESSION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24128 _d24128 |
||