000			01668cab a2200265 4500
001			E2055
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u37303
041			_aeng
245			_aExecutor of Miss Maclean v Kershaw and others
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aSLC _v1993 R 145-165(21)
520			_aSLC Application Western Isles RN 2595 Order of 17 November 1993. The executor of a former tenant of a holding consisting of a house and garden applied to the Court to define the nature of her tenancy. She had become the tenant, at a rent of £3 per annum, on the death of her mother, the previous tenant, in 1987, and had remained in the property until her own death in 1993. Her brother claimed to be the tenant-at-will of the property, a right he claimed as devolving on him as the only som and heir of theirfather, who died intestate in 1927. he challenged the jurisdiction of the Court to determine the status of a holding as being a tenancy-at- will, claiming that such jurisdiction was statutorily conferred on the Lands Tribunal. Having given their reasons for rejecting this general proposition, the Court found that the holding was a cottar tenancy, the landlord himself adhering to this view and there being no evidence of any tenancies-at-will in the district. In any event, the son had f
650			_aCOTTAR TENANCY
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 1979
650			_aSCOTLAND
650			_aSCOTTISH LAND COURT
650			_aSLC
650			_aTENANCY AT WILL
650			_aTENURE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24133 _d24133