000			01139cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS42506
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u37338
041			_aeng
245			_aHillman v Beverley BC
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 14 EG 137
520			_aCA 16 October 1990. The appellant (H) appealed against a LT decision under Land Compensation Act 1961 s5 Rule 2 and s9. Appeal under section 9 was discounted by the court as irrelevant. H owned a property subject to a demolition order . After acquiring the house under compulsory powers, the council (B) demolished the house and H received site value compensation which he now disputed. H contended that the house under a demolition order may still have commanded a higher value with the possibility of the order`s being revoked. The LT`s decision was upheld however, as revocation of demolition order seemed to be "very remote".
650			_aUNFIT HOUSE
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24155 _d24155