000			01320cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS42592
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u37743
041			_aeng
245			_aLloyds Bank plc and Rosset and another
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1990) 2 WLR 867-879(13)
520			_aHL 29 March 1990. A husband and wife bought a house with money from the husband`s family trust . The trustees insisted that the property be in the husband`s name only. The husband took out an extra loan from Lloyds Bank (L) to renovate the house and later default ed on repayments. L began proceedings towards repossession . The husband and wife had by then split up. The wife, (R), appealed that she had an overriding interest in the property under Land Registration Act 1925 s20(1) and s70(1)(g) by being in occupation . HL found that the date of transfer of the estate, not of its registration , was the relevant date in determining existence of a claim to overriding interest. The court also considered intention between R and her husband that R should have a beneficial interest in the property and also R`s contribution of time and effort in renovating the property.
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24309 _d24309