| 000 | 00876cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS42597 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u37772 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTomlin v Westminister City Council | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v1990 RA 79-91(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 20 June 1989. The appellant (T) occupied what used to be the Cambodian Embassy but had not paid rates . At issue was whether T was in fact in rateable occupation . The CA found that T was in rateable occupation. He was squatting on the premises with people and liability for rates could be enforced against any of them if each was in occupation of all the premises and not just part of it. | ||
| 650 | _aDIPLOMATIC PREMISES | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEAL | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24317 _d24317 |
||