000			01249cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS51659
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u37952
041			_aeng
245			_aSt Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Payne
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) EG 45 156-158(3)
520			_aCA 15 November 1993. On 9 July 1990, S made a successful bid at an auction for freehold investment premises and paid a 10% deposit. The auction particulars contained a photograph including a lateral line with arrow heads marking the extent of the property. The left hand arrow head incorrectly included a doorway to the left of the premises which was not owned by P. When S realised the particulars were wrong, return of the deposit was claimed. In proceedings transferred from HC, S based the claim on misdescription, misrepresentation and the general discretion of the Law of Property Act 1925 s49(2). Judgment to S.
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S49(2)
650			_aMISDESCRIPTION
650			_aMISREPRESENTATION
650			_aAuctioneering _96218
650			_aST MARYLEBONE PROPERTY CO LTD V PAYNE
690			_aAuctioneering _96218
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24401 _d24401