| 000 | 01177cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2936-31 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u37956 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCriteria for farmer`s compensation | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _v29 September 1993, 13(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Thomas and another v Countryside Council for Wales" QBD 23 July 1993. An arbitrator was wrong to assess compensation under Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 for the creation of an area of special scientific interest only on the financial loss to the farmer. Amenity and and aesthetic preference should be considered. | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aDOE CIRCULAR 04/1983 | ||
| 650 |
_aLand use _96251 |
||
| 650 | _aPROFITS | ||
| 650 | _aSHEEP FARMING | ||
| 650 | _aSITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aWILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 S28 | ||
| 650 | _aWILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 S50(3) | ||
| 690 | _aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24403 _d24403 |
||