000			00922cab a2200229 4500
001			WB2929-32
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u38192
041			_aeng
245			_aTerm does not exclude set-off
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aTimes _v27 July 1993, 32(1)
520			_a"Connaught Restaurants Ltd v Indoor Leisure Ltd" CA 19 July 1993. In allowing the appeal by tenants, held that a lease provision that rent should be paid `without any deductions` was too ambiguous to exclude tenant`s equitable right to set off unliquidated claims for damages for landlord`s breach of covenant against rent due.
650			_aAKEHURST V STENA SEALINK LTD
650			_aBREACHES OF COVENANT
650			_aCLAIM FOR DAMAGES
650			_aFAMOUS ARMY STORES V MEEHAN
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24539 _d24539